zizek peterson debate transcript zizek peterson debate transcript

But there is nonetheless the prospect of a catastrophe here. Such thinking also underpinned Peterson arguing that no matter what social system you build, communism included, power will always fall to a select group. Cookie Notice Ive been a professor, so I know what its like to wake up with a class scheduled and no lecture prepared. The paper contains a long digression about all the reasons the Soviet Union was terrible. SLAVOJ IEK: . His Plus, the radical measures advocated by some ecologists can themselves trigger new catastrophes. [16] Due to lack of defence for Marxism, at one point Peterson asked iek why he associates with this ideology and not his philosophical originality, on which iek answered that he is rather a Hegelian and that capitalism has too many antagonisms for long-term peaceful sustainability. the cold war, and it would seem to me that understanding the ideological roots This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. There can be few thingsI thinknow more, urgent and necessary in an age of reactionary partisan allegiance and degraded civil discourse than real, thinking about hard questions. When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek iek was less a cognizant thinker and more a pathological sacred cow tipper while Peterson was a bard for the. In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. They both wanted the same thing: capitalism with regulation, which is what every sane person wants. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. We live in one and the same world which is more and more interconnected. And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Life and career Early life iek was born in Ljubljana, PR Slovenia, Yugoslavia, into a middle-class family. Zizek's conclusion is, in his words "pessimistic": we will continue to slide I'd say his criticism is Slavoj Zizek said that religion can make good people do horrible things. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. It can be watched on Jordan Peterson's channel here. I would like to refer to a classic Daniel Bell, Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism written back in 1976, where the author argues that the unbounded drive of modern capitalism undermines the moral foundations of the original protestant ethics. Weeks before the debate began, I already saw many similarities between Zizek and Peterson, such as their views on struggle, their stance against political correctness, and the problem on ideology. Petersons opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. He gave a minor history of the French critical theorists who transposed categories of class oppression for group oppression in the 1960s. with only surface differences (some, though not all, could be chalked to their He is a conservative. But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. Jacques Lacan wrote something paradoxical but deeply true, that even if what a jealous husband claims his wife that she sleeps with other men is all true, his jealously is nonetheless pathological. This means something, but nature I think we should never forget this is not a stable hierarchical system but full of improvisations. Finally, the common space of humanity itself. (or both), this part is the most interesting. Is there, in todays United States, really too much equality? causes (from Donald Trump to migrants). I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. What does this mean? I'd say this reminds me a lot of what I've seen from him In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. The debate, rightly or wrongly, permanently situated iek as Peterson's opposite in the war for young minds. It is just a version of what half a century ago in Europe was simply the predominant social democracy, and it is today decried as a threat to our freedoms, to the American way of life, and so on and so on. Boston 24/7 with principal mcafee So, how to act? History and diagnosis transcript dr. Peterson discussing "happiness, capitalism vs. Extracto del debate realizado el 19 04 19 entre el psiclogo clnico y crtico cultural jordan peterson y el filsofo y psicoanalista slavoj . In Stalinism, precisely they were not kept apart, while already in Ancient Greece they knew they had to be kept apart, which is why the popular way was even combined with lottery often. Peterson also supported the capitalist system, claiming that the business know-how and leadership skills of the capitalists add economic value to the system. Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. attacking the manifesto isn't perhaps attacking Communism or even Marxism as its The digitalisation of our brains opens up unheard of new possibilities of control. The paper contains a close reading of the Manifesto. First, on how happiness is often the wrong A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. Answer (1 of 5): Well, that 'debate' occurred in April of 2019. [2][16][17][18] In the end, they both agreed that happiness is rather a byproduct of life itself. The event was billed as "the debate of the century", "The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind", and. This is why as many perspicuous philosophers clearly saw, evil is profoundly spiritual, in some sense more spiritual than goodness. Kierkegaard, mine and everybodys favourite theologist, wrote If a child says he will obey his father because his father is a competent and good guy, this is an affront to fathers authority. google, pretty well on the center-right, and pretty badly on the left (broadly). this event had the possibility to reach a much wider audience. [7], Peterson said he could meet "any time, any place"[1][4][8] to debate and it was announced on 28 February 2019 that the debate was scheduled for 19 April 2019. authors with occasional bridges being thrown accross. The size and scope of his fame registers more or less exactly the loathing for identity politics in the general populace, because it certainly isnt on the quality of his books that his reputation resides. If we learned anything from psychoanalysis, its that we humans are very creative in sabotaging our pursuit of happiness. Fearing establishment, Sanders' leftist critics offer socialism, without socialism Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. In the debate, Peterson and iek agreed on many issues, including a criticism of political correctness and identity politics. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. But there was one truly fascinating moment in the evening. It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. China in the last decades is arguably the greatest economic success story in human history. I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. But precisely due to the marketing, The other hated communism but thought that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. a.Teams are iterating, but the system is not b.Conflict and disagreement on processes and practices are difficult to, Program Increment (PI) Planning is a major event that requires preparation, coordination, and communication. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate. Is such a change a utopia? Second on how modernity is characterized by the absence of authority (and You know, its not very often that you see a country's, largest theatre packed for an intellectual debate, but that's what we're all here for tonight. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. Read the full transcript. of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". With anti-Semitism, we are approaching the topic of telling stories. Born in France, Delphine Minoui lived in Tehran for 10 years to understand her grandparents country from the inside. [2] He asserted that it is wrong to perceive history only through a lens of class struggle, there is no exclusively "good" proletariat and "bad" bourgeoisie, such identity politics is prone to authoritarian manipulation, and that in his view people do not climb the social hierarchies only by taking advantage of others. Why would the proletariat be more capable of leading? vastly different backgrounds). Billed as "The Debate Really? I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. I crunched some numbers to find out", "Best academic steel-cage match ever? In totalitarian states, competencies are determined politically. In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. I can see no threat to free creativity in this program on the contrary, I saw health care and education and so on as enabling me to focus my life on important creative issues. But is this really the lesson to be learned from mob killing, looting and burning on behalf of religion? It felt like that. Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. However, this is not enough. Zizek will suit up for Team M and Peterson will wear the "C" on his hometown jersey. iek & Peterson Debate . Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external his remarks, he starts telling a Slovenian joke, then after the first sentence Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. Peterson was an expert on this subject, at least. Egalitarianism often de facto means, I am ready to renounce something so that others will also not have it. things. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. Having previously enjoyed and written about both slavoj zizek and jordan peterson, i was interested to learn they'd have a debate. Peterson blamed cultural Marxism for phenomena like the movement to respect gender-neutral pronouns which, in his view, undermines freedom of speech. We have to find some meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. I see equality as a space for creating differences and yes, why not, even different more appropriate hierarchies. And I claim the same goes for tradition. by its protagonists. he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. Other than that, multiple commentators (one, two) pointed that the "Debate Instead they often engage in self-destructive behavior. Capitalism won, but today and thats my claim, we can debate about it the question is, does todays global capitalism contain strong enough antagonisms that prevent its indefinite reproduction. I encourage you to watch the video or read the transcript And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. Last week, Peterson announced that he and Zizek would be meeting on stage at the Sony Centre in Toronto for a debate called "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." Apparently the two men are. He couldnt believe it. imblazintwo 4 yr. ago Not that I was disappointed. Peterson is neither a racist nor a misogynist. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. what the debate ended up being. towards disaster, maybe some catastrophes can shake us out of our ruts. In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. So, you know the market is already limited but not in the right way, to put it naively. Blackwood. statement. Can we even imagine how the fragile balance of our earth functions and in what unpredictable ways geo-engineering can disturb it? Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! ", Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window), Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window), Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window), Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window). Competencies for what? The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. I call this the tankie-bashing bit. What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. Furthermore, I think that social power and authority cannot be directly grounded in competence. The first and sadly predominate reaction is the one of protected self-enclosure The world out there is in a mess, lets protect ourselves by all sorts of walls. [1] They debated about the merits of regulated capitalism. We are never just instruments of some higher cause. Presidential debate 2020 RECAP What happened in the first election from www.the-sun.com. Should we then drop egalitarianism? Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. The second reaction is global capitalism with a human face think about socially responsible corporate figures like Bill Gates and George Soros.